Who called that ______ a piccolo player?

From Insider Trading to Conspiracy Theories:

Trump’s Cabinet Reveals a Dangerous Trend — Loyalty First, Leadership Last

Of all the qualified Republican politicians and public servants — and let's be honest, even a few outside the party — you have to wonder:

Why does Donald Trump continually scrape the bottom of the barrel when assembling a Cabinet?

Most of these people aren’t just underqualified to lead the organizations they're supposed to oversee —
but in the words of Robin Harris:

Who called that muthafucker a piccolo player?

Here’s the lineup:

  • Marco Rubio – Secretary of State

    • Criticized for hawkish foreign policy toward Latin America, China, and Iran.

    • Received a 0/100 rating from the Human Rights Campaign for his voting record on LGBTQ+ rights.

  • Pete Hegseth – Secretary of Defense

    • Shared classified military information over unsecured messaging apps.

    • Accused of sexual misconduct and alcohol abuse.

    • Proposed renaming the Department of Defense to the "Department of War."

  • Pam Bondi – Attorney General

    • Promoted false claims about the 2020 election.

    • Criticized for lack of independence from Trump.

  • Kristi Noem – Secretary of Homeland Security

    • Banned from parts of South Dakota by Native American tribes.

    • Public outrage after writing about killing her own dog in her memoir.

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – Secretary of Health and Human Services

    • Spread anti-vaccine misinformation.

    • Criticized for gutting public health funding.

  • Linda McMahon – Secretary of Education

    • Enabled sexual abuse at WWE, according to lawsuits.

    • Misrepresented her college degree (claimed education, it was French).

    • Gutted Department of Education budgets and DEI programs.

    • Implicated in WWE's steroid distribution scandal.

    • Opposed by educators and civil rights organizations.

  • Brooke Rollins – Secretary of Agriculture

    • Promoted conspiracy theories.

    • Pushed policies favoring large corporate farms over small farmers.

  • Sean Duffy – Secretary of Transportation

    • Opposed affordable housing and initiatives to help the homeless.

  • Howard Lutnick – Secretary of Commerce

    • Led a company that repeatedly violated gaming laws.

    • Privately expressed doubts about Trump's tariff policies.

  • Lori Chavez-DeRemer – Secretary of Labor

    • Criticized for anti-reproductive rights votes and cozy ties to unions.

  • Doug Collins – Secretary of Veterans Affairs

    • Accused of cutting contracts vital to veteran services.

  • Scott Turner – Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

    • Opposed affordable housing expansion.

  • Doug Burgum – Secretary of the Interior

    • Sued the Interior Department multiple times.

    • Criticized for prioritizing fossil fuel interests over environmental protections.

  • Jamieson Greer – U.S. Trade Representative

    • Seen as a “rubber stamp” for Trump's trade policies.

  • Lee Zeldin – EPA Administrator

    • Politicized claims of waste at the EPA, despite admitting no wrongdoing.

  • Russell Vought – OMB Director

    • Architect of Project 2025, aiming to consolidate executive power.

    • Supported Schedule F, gutting protections for civil servants.

    • Advocated for withholding Congress-approved spending.

    • Contentious confirmation process.

  • John Ratcliffe – CIA Director

    • Politicized intelligence assessments to favor Trump.

    • Lacked meaningful intelligence experience.

    • Declassified sensitive info for political purposes.

    • Caught up in “Signalgate” (unsecured messaging scandal).

    • Fired dozens of CIA DEI officers.

  • Tulsi Gabbard – Director of National Intelligence

    • Met with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

    • Echoed Russian talking points about Ukraine.

    • Raised in a controversial religious sect.

    • Lavished with favorable coverage by Russian state media.

  • Kelly Loeffler – SBA Administrator

    • Accused of insider trading after COVID briefings.

    • Fought with WNBA players over Black Lives Matter support.

    • Linked to far-right conspiracy theorists and election deniers.

    • Donated to anti-LGBTQ groups.

    • Questionable text messages surfaced after the 2020 election.

🧬 Final Word

This isn’t merely the Island of Misfit Toys.

It’s the Island of Dr. Moreau.

A Cabinet assembled not from the best and brightest,
but from political experiments —
half-formed loyalties, ideological mutations, and ethical compromises,
all stitched together in service of a single will: Trump's.

The real danger isn't incompetence.
It’s what happens when ambition, grievance, and power hunger are fused without restraint —
creating something not merely chaotic, but monstrous.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mandates, Myths, and Manufactured Fear

With the current unrest in Los Angeles, most news reports have recently begun by implying in some way that Trump received a mandate to enact mass deportations. First and foremost, that is patently untrue, starting with the fact that Trump did not receive a mandate; he did not win by a simple majority, but rather a plurality. To define a plurality as a mandate is a distortion of the language, a betrayal of democratic clarity, and a dishonest political strategy to falsely claim broad public endorsement. Beyond that, Trump’s stated reason for mass deportation was supposed to be to “restore law and order,” and that he would only deport the most violent and dangerous criminals. According to The Daily Beast , Stephen Miller explicitly ordered “ICE to conduct raids targeting undocumented day laborers at Home Depot parking lots” and stressed arresting all undocumented individuals, not just criminals, setting quotas of about 3,000 arrests per day and threatening to fire officials who didn’t...
Read more

Reduce vocabulary, and you reduce the capacity for complex thought

A few years ago on Valentine’s Day, I sang in a Barbershop Quartet for a friend’s kindergarten class. When we finished, one of the children — without being prompted — exclaimed, “That was expensive.” We took it as a sincere and generous compliment. After all, this little girl had reached deep into the recesses of her vocabulary and offered us the highest praise she could muster, based on three years of socialization and maybe six months of formal education. That was acceptable — even touching — coming from a four-year-old. Unfortunately, the President of the United States seems to have only a slightly larger vocabulary than that kindergartener. At best, he speaks at a fourth-grade level. When confronted by a journalist or anyone he considers an adversary, his responses are rarely more nuanced than, “That was a nasty question,” or “You’re not being very nice.” How far away are we from "nanny nanny boo boo?" We've gone from "Ask not what your country can do for you...
Read more